|
A: |
Steady
state describes a condition wherein there is no change in speed.
The means for measuring power on dynamic
loading dynamometers, or steady state dynamometers, is to absorb
the power being generated while a strain gauge, or load cell,
provides a signal proportional to force being applied.
This is achieved by attaching a moment arm equipped with a
load cell to the braking device – usually perpendicular to the
drive shaft. This
process is utilized by nearly every engine dynamometer in
operation today for tuning and breaking-in of engines – just the
same as it is with any steady state chassis dynamometer.
Earlier,
more rudimentary systems offered open-loop control systems that
allow the user to increase or decrease load, or resistance, via a
dial-based potentiometer – but without the means to base load
off of another variable (i.e. speed).
In order to hold the system at any one speed independent of
throttle, the user had to keep adjusting load in an attempt to
damper fluctuations in throttle position.
Closed-loop
controllers, on the other hand, allow for hassle-free steady state
tuning. In the case
of the chassis dynamometer, the computer-controller holds the
vehicle at the designated speed independent of throttle position,
save those circumstances where the vehicle’s output exceeds the
rating of the dynamometer.
To
further enhance utility, more advanced controllers allow the user
to preprogram a series of speed-points over several time
intervals, typically referred to as step-tests or programmed-load
tests. While this
type of testing is typical of engine dynamometers, it has not been
as closely associated with chassis dynamometers among high
performance professionals, primarily due to the explosion of the
inertial-exclusive chassis dynamometer in the mid-nineties.
More
recent technological advances have led to much more sophisticated
closed-loop control systems, which incorporate algorithms to
compensate for the inertial and aerodynamic characteristics of
particular vehicles. Simulation
testing is a combination of both acceleration power and static
power. This
technology has led to new breakthroughs in performance testing -
allowing users to simulate actual road-load conditions with the
push of a button. Elapsed
Time Testing (ET Testing) can be achieved, including distance
tests (quarter-mile sprint), rolling acceleration tests (60 –
90-mph), and standing start acceleration tests (0-60-mph).
If run properly, these tests will correlate very closely
with data collected under real-world track conditions.
The real advantage of these machines is that they can
actually reproduce the competitive playing field; certainly a
benefit for those of us whose success can be ascertained by
counting the number of trophies we’ve won.
The
Air-cooled Eddy Current Power Absorption Unit
has proven to be, dollar for dollar, the best means for
controlling load on a chassis dynamometer. As a result, it is
estimated that more than sixty percent of the loading chassis
dynamometers currently in operation employ an air-cooled Eddy
Current PAU. The Air-cooled Eddy Current Power Absorption Unit is
essentially an Electromagnetic Brake. The load applied is
frictionless, and positively related to the amount of DC Current
applied to the coils of the brake.
As the brake absorbs the kinetic energy transmitted by the
test vehicle, it transforms this energy into heat, and dissipates
this energy into the ambient air.
The
first chassis dynamometer used a hydrokinetic brake, or water
brake. Controlling a valve upstream from the device
regulates load applied. Recycling of the water requires local
circuitry, consisting primarily of a water source, the
dynamometer, a cooling tower, with plumbing and pumps between the
three. For applications that demanded “brute force”
over extended periods of time fluid based brakes remained a very
viable solution.
DC
and AC Motors offer the user the ability to actively load
and drive the system; ideal for applications requiring transient
load capabilities - generative power and regenerative power.
The term transient describes a test whose main purpose is to simulate dynamic
road-load (changes in load over time) under varying levels of
acceleration and deceleration.
The two most well known transient test cycles, or driving
schedules, are the Federal Test Procedure (FTP) and the I/M 240;
both of which were developed by engineers at the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) in cooperation with OEMs and Test
Equipment Manufacturers. These tests mirror driving habits
encountered in suburban areas.
The I/M 240 is essentially a small 240-second section of
the FTP Test. Today,
I/M 240 Testing can be found in the states of Missouri, Illinois,
Ohio, Arizona, and Washington.
In addition the these well-known tests, virtually any
driving schedule that can be defined in terms of speed over time
over percent grade can be duplicated on a properly sized transient
dynamometer
AC
and DC based chassis dynamometers are relatively expensive, and
therefore not practical for some applications.
Laboratory-grade test systems are typically very useful and
extremely accurate when used to perform the test they are designed
for.
However, these applications are usually very
purpose-specific; with the equipment being designed from the
ground-up to accommodate only one prescribed test.
In many cases, these prescribed test applications can be
traced back to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), or some
other agency responsible for policing the transportation
industries.
In other cases, test equipment may be engineered around a
customer’s unique needs and requirements.
|